We all know Obama is absolutely nuts. The man is just crazy. So, it only seems natural that he would select someone like John P. Holdren to be an advisor. Check out this winner of a human and his awesome opinions.
Trees should have legal rights to sue
Born Baby will eventually become a human
NUTTY!!!!!! But, having a guy like this on board the Obama admin is par for the course. What else would we expect from a crazy man?!? I think Obama will next name his buddy Ayers as "Police czar". That would make as much sense as Holdren as science czar.
POSTED BY The Conservative Conquistador
Thursday, July 30, 2009
Wednesday, July 29, 2009
another conservative politician making up their own statistics...
so i read recently that sen. robert bennett has his panties in a bunch over ARRA roadside signs. well, in my recent travels across 8 states and 100's upon 100's of miles of construction, i only saw one such sign. i did, however, see two signs (billboards in fact) adverstising the refusal to accept stimulus money. didn't the tax payers also pay for those?
Saturday, July 11, 2009
Those Nasty Corporations
Again, I ask, Who are the culprits in our society? Are corporations bad? Is the government altruistic and compassionate? A new report says that the government (Fannie and Freddie) are responsible for the housing bust and the current economic crisis.
Read The Article
So, I guess the liberals can get off the backs of corporations and start pointing the fingers at politicians. Like that would ever happen.
POSTED BY: The Conservative Conquistador.
PS - Sorry about all the posts. They have been building up and I am just getting around to posting.
Read The Article
So, I guess the liberals can get off the backs of corporations and start pointing the fingers at politicians. Like that would ever happen.
POSTED BY: The Conservative Conquistador.
PS - Sorry about all the posts. They have been building up and I am just getting around to posting.
Those Compassionate Liberals Are At It Again...
Compassionate Liberal Case #1
Here is this interview with Ruth Bader Ginsburg. My question is this: Is she talking about 1) eugenics or 2) economic cleansing (aka killing children of poor people)? It has to be one or the other.
The interviewer asked Ginsburg: “If you were a lawyer again, what would you want to accomplish as a future feminist agenda?”
“Reproductive choice has to be straightened out,” Ginsburg said. “There will never be a woman of means without choice anymore. That just seems to me so obvious. The states that changed their abortion laws before Roe (to make abortion legal) are not going to change back. So we have a policy that only affects poor women, and it can never be otherwise, and I don’t know why this hasn’t been said more often.”
Ginsburg discussed her surprise at the outcome of Harris v. McRae, a 1980 decision that upheld the Hyde Amendment, which prohibited the use of Medicaid and other federal funds for abortions.
Here’s a transcript of that portion of the Times' interview:
Q. Are you talking about the distances women have to travel because in parts of the country, abortion is essentially unavailable, because there are so few doctors and clinics that do the procedure? And also, the lack of Medicaid for abortions for poor women?
Justice Ginsburg: Yes, the ruling about that surprised me. Frankly, I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of (emphasis mine). So that Roe was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion. Which some people felt would risk coercing women into abortions when they didn’t really want them. But when the Court decided McRae, the case came out the other way. And then I realized that my perception of it had been altogether wrong.”
Compassionate Liberal Case #2
Here is this interview with Ruth Bader Ginsburg. My question is this: Is she talking about 1) eugenics or 2) economic cleansing (aka killing children of poor people)? It has to be one or the other.
The interviewer asked Ginsburg: “If you were a lawyer again, what would you want to accomplish as a future feminist agenda?”
“Reproductive choice has to be straightened out,” Ginsburg said. “There will never be a woman of means without choice anymore. That just seems to me so obvious. The states that changed their abortion laws before Roe (to make abortion legal) are not going to change back. So we have a policy that only affects poor women, and it can never be otherwise, and I don’t know why this hasn’t been said more often.”
Ginsburg discussed her surprise at the outcome of Harris v. McRae, a 1980 decision that upheld the Hyde Amendment, which prohibited the use of Medicaid and other federal funds for abortions.
Here’s a transcript of that portion of the Times' interview:
Q. Are you talking about the distances women have to travel because in parts of the country, abortion is essentially unavailable, because there are so few doctors and clinics that do the procedure? And also, the lack of Medicaid for abortions for poor women?
Justice Ginsburg: Yes, the ruling about that surprised me. Frankly, I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of (emphasis mine). So that Roe was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion. Which some people felt would risk coercing women into abortions when they didn’t really want them. But when the Court decided McRae, the case came out the other way. And then I realized that my perception of it had been altogether wrong.”
Compassionate Liberal Case #2
SACRAMENTO, Calif. – California lawmakers remain at an impasse over solving the state's $24.3 billion deficit as the state controller prepares to hand out roughly $3 billion in IOUs.
A Friday morning vote on a portion of the Democratic budget plan fell short of the necessary two-thirds support in the Assembly. Lawmakers were planning to work through the weekend.
State Controller John Chiang says without a budget revision, he will have to start issuing IOUs as soon as Thursday. The state will not have enough cash to meet all of its payment obligations as the new fiscal year begins.
Among those who would not get paid until after October are students expecting college fee assistance, low-income seniors and the disabled, and vendors that provide an array of services (emphasis mine).
Way to practice what you preach, Democrats.
POSTED BY: The Conservative Conquistador
Now He's Like JFK
I can't help but laugh at the times that Obama tells people (can we believe anything that comes out of his mouth, at this point?) that he is like JFK. HA! Don't even get me started on his comparing himself to Abraham Lincoln. Ridiculous. If you look at what JFK did and said, he would be a Republican today. Obama is just a...crazy.
But, yesterday I saw proof that Obama does have a little JFK in him. Enjoy.
But, yesterday I saw proof that Obama does have a little JFK in him. Enjoy.
Wednesday, July 8, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)